Literaturliste Chirurgen Magazin + BAO Depesche 2.2021 (Mai 2021)

Hier finden Sie die Literaturlisten der Fachbeiträge aus der aktuellen Ausgabe.

Literaturliste zum Beitrag Schmerztherapie bei ambulanten
Hernienoperationen‘
von Dr. Karl H. Moser (Chirurgen Magazin + BAO Depesche 2.2021, Mai 2021), Seite 44 ff.

  1. Brökelmann J: Vergleich von OECD-Daten durch die IAAS: Deutschlands OP-Statistik ist mangelhaft! In: BAO Depesche 32, April 2014 2. BAO Depesche: Ausgabe 32, April 2014 (www.operieren.de)
  2. Meissner W (2011) QUIPS: Quality improvement in postoperative pain management. Z Evid Fortb Qual Gesundhwes 105:350-353
  3. Lux EA, Stamer U, Meissner W et al (2008) Postoperative Schmerztherapie nach ambulanten Operationen. Schmerz 22:171-175
  4. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Metha SS, Gan TJ (2003) Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anaesth Analg 97:534-540
  5. Brodner G, Mertes N, Buerkle H et al (2000) Acute pain management: analysis, implications and consequenses after prospective experience with 6349 surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 17: 566-575
  6. Lux EA, Stamer U, Meissner W, (2011) Postoperative Schmerztherapie nach ambulanten Operationen – Eine Befragung der behandelnden Anästhesisten
  7. Simanski C (2013) Qualitätsmanagement Akutschmerztherapie – Erfahrungsbericht über 6 Jahre – TÜV-Zertifizierung aus Sicht des Chirurgen. Passion Chir 3(01):4-10
  8. Dihle A. et  al. (2006) The Exploration of the establishment of cutpoints to categorize the severity of acute postoperative pain. Clin J Pain: 617-624
  9. Pavlin DJ, et al. (2004) A survey of pain and other symptoms that affect the recovery process after discharge from an ambulatory surgery unit. J clin. Anesth.:16(3):200-206
  10. Schnabel A. et al (2010) Prädiktoren für chronische Schmerzen nach Operationen. Der Schmerz. :24:517-33
  11. Althaus A, Hinrichs-Rocker A, Capman CR, Aranz Becker O, Lefering R, Simanski C, Weber F, Moser K, Joppich R, Trojan S, Gutzeit N, Neugebauer E (2011) Development of a risk index for the prediction of chronic post-surgical pain. Eur J Pain. DOI 10, 1002/J,1532-2149.2011.00090
  12. Riddle DL et al.  (2010) Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. Relat Res . 468(3): 798-806
  13. Colloca L, Klinger R, Flor H, Bingel U (2013) Placebo analgesia: psychological and neurobiological mechanisms. Pain 154(4):511-514
  14. Roth P von,  Perka C, Dirschedl K et al (2012) Use of redon drains in primary hip arthroplasty has no clinically relevant benefits Orthopedics 35 (11): e 1592-e1595
  15. Gilron I, Orr E, Tu D, Mercer CD, Bond D: (2009) A randomized double blind controlled trial of perioperative administration of gabapentin, meloxicam and their combination for spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after ambulatory laparoscopic chole-cystectomy. Anaesth Analg 108:623-630
  16. American Society of Anesthesiologist Task Force on acute Pain Management setting an updated report.(2012) Anesthesiology. 116(2):248-273
  17. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF et al (2011) Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scale, Verbal Rating Scales and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain 41:1073-1093
  18. Freys F.M , Pogatzki-Zahn E. (2021)  Akutschmerz-Therapie in der operativen Medizin, De Gruyter ISBN 978-3-11-059644-1

Literaturliste zum Beitrag ‚Liefert emotionale Evidenz neue Argumente für offene Nahtverfahren?‘ von Antje Thiel (Chirurgen Magazin + BAO Depesche 2.2021, Mai 2021), Seite 48 ff.

  1. Elmessiry MM et al. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia: A three-armed Randomized controlled trial. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov; 59: 145–150. Published online 2020 Sep 9. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.055
  2. Köckerling F et al. TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 Patients wicht a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Burg Endoc 2015; 29: 3750
  3. Hung TY. Safety of two common laparoskopic inguinal herniorraphy approaches: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9 (5)
  4. Maneck M et al. Hospital volume and outcome in inguinal hernia repair: analysis of routine data of 133,449 patients. Hernia 2020; 24: 747
  5. Hernia Surge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia (2018) 22:1–165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
  6. Bökkerink WKV et al. Long-term results from a randomized comparison of open transinguinal preperitoneal hernia repair and the Lichennstein Methode (TULIP trial). British Journal of Surgery 2019; 106 (7): 856–861
  7. Malik A et al. Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical specialty hospital and general hospitals in Ontario. Can J Burg 2016; 59: 19–25
  8. Barbaro A et al. Laparascopic extraperitoneal reparier versus open inguinal hernia reparier: 20-year follow-up of a randomized Controller trial. Hernia 2017; 21: 723–727
  9. Lorenz R et al. Shouldice Standard 2020: Review of the current Literatur and results of an international consensus meeting. Hernia 2021, DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02365-61
  10. Bracale U et al. Is Shouldice the best Non-Mesh inguinal hernia repair technique? A systematic review and network metaanalysis of randomized Controller Trias comparing Shouldice and Desarda. Int J Burg 2019; 62: 12–21
  11. Mohamedahmed AYY et al. Non-mesh Desarda Technicus Versus Standard Mesh-Based Lichtenstein Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Burg 2020; 44 (10): 3312–3321
  12. Rossetti F et al. Mesh-related visceral complications following inguinal hernia repair: An emerging topic. Hernia 2019; 23: 699–708
  13. Baker WJ et al. Influence of previous laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair on performing radical prostatectomy: a nationwide survey among urological surgeons. Surg Endosc 2020 doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07676-4. Online ahead of print.
  14. Cohen Tervaert JW. Autoinflammatory/autoimmuniy syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA; Shoenfeld’s syndrome): A new Flame. Autoimmun Rev 2018; 17: 1259–1264
  15. Diagnostik und Therapie der Endometriose. S2k-Leitlinie der Deutschen, Österreichischen und Schweizerischen Gesellschaften für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, August 2020, AWMF-Registernummer 015/045
  16. Wolfhager N et al. Inguinal endometriosis, a rare entity of which surgeons should be aware: clinical aspects and longterm follow-up of nine cases. Hernia 2018; 22 (5): 881–886
  17. Niebuhr H et al. What are the influencing factors for chronic pain following TAPP inguinal hernia repair: an Analysis of 20,004 Patient from the Herniamed registry. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:1971–1983 DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5893-2

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s